Acquisition preflight
Evaluate the proposed resource, declared purpose, caller-supplied normalized evidence and tenant policy.
Pilot output: proceed · deny · reviewCheck each proposed retrieval against your policy and the evidence your integration supplies. Get proceed, constrain, license, review or block—with reasons and constraints your agent must enforce.
Decision boundary: AgentGuard reports an operational result from your configured policy and the evidence supplied to it. It does not grant a license, determine legal rights, or replace legal review.
Declared request
Final decision
Conditionalengine v0.1.0
Target retrieval workflow
The production roadmap separates acquisition from response use because a response can carry narrower signals. Today, the pilot evaluates normalized evidence supplied by the customer; it does not collect the target resource.
Evaluate the proposed resource, declared purpose, caller-supplied normalized evidence and tenant policy.
Pilot output: proceed · deny · reviewA planned customer-side enforcement point can capture response headers and safe metadata before releasing content downstream.
Roadmap: content remains outside agent contextThe target workflow combines response evidence, caller-attested entitlement records and stricter tenant constraints.
Roadmap: release · constrain · licensing review · blockOperational, not rhetorical
Every API result includes stable reason codes, policy revision, considered evidence, freshness and the evaluator version.
Explore the decision modelYour configured policy returns no blocking condition on the supplied evidence.
Your integration should apply the returned retention, attribution or output limits.
Supplied policy evidence requires a separate customer licensing review.
Your configured policy blocks acquisition or downstream use.
Ambiguous evidence is held for your designated policy owner.
Built for the retrieval path
Keep robots rules, usage signals, response headers, RSL terms and customer observations separate—with provenance intact.
The pilot treats entitlement data as customer-supplied evidence. Registry-backed verification is planned; an allowlist alone never creates rights.
Start with sanitized replay traffic. Live shadow or enforcement depends on a separately scoped customer integration and is not a public-site feature.
The evaluator returns its version, policy revision, considered evidence IDs and reason codes. The current API accepts no page bodies.
Source-handling roadmap
AgentGuard is not building or claiming a continuously current permission database of the internet.
The caller supplies bounded, normalized evidence and entitlement records. The API evaluates them without requesting the resource URL.
For new or expired resources, an isolated collector would request only relevant published policy signals when a customer asks.
Repeated domain/path signals may be reused only within a source-specific freshness window, with the evidence snapshot tied to each result.
Enterprise customers may nominate high-value domains for scheduled refresh. No whole-web crawl or full-page archive is planned.
Designed for production integration
The current authenticated pilot API evaluates normalized evidence supplied within an agreed pilot scope. The public sandbox remains fixture-only, and neither path fetches a target URL.
{
"schema": "agentguard.decision.v1",
"decisionScope": "CUSTOMER_CONFIGURED_POLICY",
"notLegalAdvice": true,
"receiptState": "NOT_ISSUED",
"decision": "PROCEED_WITH_CONSTRAINTS",
"stage": "RESPONSE_USE",
"enforcement": "ALLOW",
"reasonCodes": [
"USAGE_CONSTRAINED",
"CUSTOMER_POLICY_CONSTRAINT"
],
"constraints": {
"maxRetentionSeconds": 2592000,
"attributionRequired": true
},
"policy": { "revisionId": "policy_018" },
"evaluatorVersion": "agentguard-policy-engine/0.1.0",
"validUntil": "2026-09-04T13:00:00Z"
}Now recruiting design partners
Start with a bounded replay pilot using a sanitized retrieval sample, your policy rules and an engineering owner. Live shadowing requires a separately scoped integration.